The Roe v Wade decision was based on an implied, if not explicit, right to privacy in the constitution.
If the court is basing decisions like abortion access on a right to privacy, then they should also start enforcing an actual right to privacy, including access to encryption.
Carpenter v. United States was 5-4, with Ginsburg in the majority. The textualists stacked up firmly against it. I wouldn't expect any help from SCOTUS for the next... ever.
The textualist theory on privacy is basically: "no trespass, no problem". The trespass theory of privacy is why Scalia was in the majority on United States v. Jones (cant attach a GPS tracker to a car without a warrant) and Kyllo v. United States (cant invade the house with an IR camera without a warrant). The lack of a physical trespass explains why his intellectual bedfellows dissented in Carpenter.
If you are going to cite a central argument to Roe v. Wade related to privacy, then you might as well mention the other argument in Roe v. Wade regarding the government’s interests in protecting an individual’s (in this case, the woman and fetuses’) health. The court balanced their decision between those two interests, hence why states are able to impose some restrictions against abortion after the first trimester.
If the court is basing decisions like abortion access on a right to privacy, then they should also start enforcing an actual right to privacy, including access to encryption.