Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Since it's not obvious that Bob has actually committed a crime, shouldn't there be some mechanism to allow the obvious profits of crime to be confiscated without having to convict Bob?

Absolutely-fucking-not.

Law enforcement should never be able to seize property without the charging of a crime when they know who owns the property.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: