Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People are mentioning caloric restriction not being worth it for humans because of quality of life vs length of life.

However one thought that I find interesting, is that for our generation, living just two or three extra years could potentially make a huge difference.

If you subscribe to the idea of a coming technological singularity, or even to the idea that we're a few decades away from SENS escape velocity, you'd hate to miss it by just a couple of years.



Might be. I think the quality of life issues are overstated, but I'm an ectomorph so I can change my food intake on a whim. Being hungry isn't a distraction to me unless I'm very busy physically.


  > I'm an ectomorph
As in ecto|meso|endo-morph? I thought that the scientific community put that idea in the trashcan.


I'm just using it to tell you what I look like.


See comments above, the original research is flawed. New research shows that moderate caloric restriction has no statistically significant effect over eating a healthy diet within your caloric needs. It is overeating which decreases your life span.


Or you'd hate to have been hungry for most of your adult life in order to live two years longer, and still miss the rapture.


Or not being able to pay for it. If it ever happens it will probably be available first for the very rich.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: